Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the main provisions contained in the domestic arbitration bill recently presented before the Uruguayan Parliament. The study focuses on the elimination of the arbitral commitment, the establishment of arbitration at law as a rule, the arbitrability of public policy norms, the reassertion of the autonomy of the arbitration agreement and the vindication of interim measures. To this end, the proposed amendments are contrasted with a critical analysis of the current legislation, to conclude that this is a very positive bill, which takes as input the best practices worldwide, and whose approval would give an important boost to domestic arbitration and to the image of our country as a reference in the region for alternative dispute resolution.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
