Abstract
The article deals with the position taken by the Constitutional Court regarding religious arguments in unconstitutional processes in controversial cases. The proposed analysis of the problem has as a theoretical reference the philosophical proposal of Jurgen Habermas on the role of religion within the public spherlisis jurisprudencial de tres propuesta acerca del rol de la religisipor todos los Magistrados de la Corte Constitucional (posie. It reflects on the argument put forward in the constitutional debate within the Constitutional Court, in the case of egalitarian marriage addressed by Sentence C – 577 of 2011. How the arguments of debate are incorporated in order to assess whether they are consistent with the liberal perspective and the role of religious arguments in this debate, are analyzed as well.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
