Abstract
The exchange of information has been evaluated by jurisprudence and comparative widespread doctrine through the rule of reason and, in some cases, as an independent behavior. In 2011, the European Union established specific regulations for such issue and ordered the analysis of the rule of reason in the context of a horizontal collusion case. However, in Peru, the exchange of information has been analyzed through the per se rule when it presented in the research framework of a hard-core cartel, which rather served as an evidence of a collusive hypothesis: a more accurate interpretation according to Peruvian legislation.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
