El error inexcusable en la legislación Ecuatoriana.

Abstract

The present investigation has been developed on the inexcusable error and the series of sanctions for the Judge that incurs in this one, that, to understand of many jurists, surpasses in drasticity, because so that the error is inexcusable it must gather the conditions contained in the mentioned article 109 of the Organic Code of the Judicial Function, that is to say that the error must contain an intent, manifest negligence and inexcusable error. 88 The State, to its fellow citizens through its maximum law, must protect them, must protect them, respect their rights, in such a way that all people are sheltered by legal security, that is why the process that protects these rights must be covered of this condition, that is to say, that the judge who serves as the constitutional judge is correct in his decision to protect these rights. This is the main premise, the Judge, given his constitutional legal spirit, is obliged to correct his decision. But what happens when this decision is wrong, because the operator of constitutional justice had a different view of the problem entrusted to him to resolve it and falls into error, the legislator has easily inserted between the disciplinary sanctions of the aforementioned inexcusable error, which in the Most cases have led to the removal of the server.