Abstract

This case involves the decision of a publishing company, El Diablo, to target a traditionally underserved market with a series of books about gang life and street vigilantism. The decision has repercussions both within the firm, as collegial relationships are tested by office politics, and outside the firm, where community response to the project is less than positive. Civil-rights groups challenge the company's development of pulp fiction targeted at black youths as unethical and likely to foment violence. The case raises several questions: Does a corporation owe a civic duty to its target constituents? How might that manifest itself? At the intersection of profit and responsibility, who has the right-of-way? Also, the hiring of a minority candidate by the minority director of the new-products division is questioned by top management. The use of role-playing is explained in the teaching note.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.