Abstract

This paper reconsiders substantial aspects contained in the debate over different forms of government in the Rio de la Plata region after the crises of the Spanish Monarchy (1808) and the May Revolution (1810), in an effort to clarify the relationship between the emergence of sovereign forms associated to urban centers and the territorial dimension of the debate's central lines .In fact the tension between different towns and the nation as a unique subject was more vigorously expressed in the second attempt of constitutional organization (1824-1827) than in the first (1816-1819). When the cities started the process by which they became autonomous states the effects of the long lasting Hispanic crises over the central role performed by the Hispano-American towns became evident. After 1820 the appearance of some type of autonomous sovereignty should not only be interpreted as a response to the crisis but as starting point of a new type of order within the state. The tension among towns (urban sovereignty) States (provincial sovereignties) and Nation (Rio de la Plata sovereignty) is reflected in the debate hold during the Constitutional Congress of 1824-1827.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.