Abstract
The conflict between Sunni and Shia groups in Sampang did not take place at once but rather through certain periods of time when each conflict had triggered another conflict. In each period, either the government and religious elite has a pivotal role to evaluate, charge or discharge, civic engagement and elite integration in the conflict process. This article is aimed to analyze the violence against Shia group in three periods of time: pre-conflict, midi-conflict, and post-conflict. The first period started after Kiai Makmun had passed away. The second was when the violence occurred in December 29th 2011 and August 26th 2012. And the third occurred after the violence had taken place. Although the conflict has run for several years, it has not shown the end. In order to explain this problem, this article bases on two hypotheses: first, the conflict has been caused by the absence of civic engagement. And second, which was caused the conflict continuation, has been caused by elite integration, which has never occurred on the society. This article concludes two things: first, civic engagement that can find only intra-communal engagement (intra-community engagement). And second, elite integration cannot be created because Shia’s Kiai had not been legitimized by Sunni’s Kiai.
Highlights
Kekerasan terhadap kelompok Syiah di Sampang tidak terjadi secara tiba-tiba
This article is aimed to analyze the violence against Shia group in three periods of time: pre-conflict, midi-conflict, and post-conflict
The first period started after Kiai Makmun had passed away
Summary
Teori Putnam tentang Social Capital merupakan awal dari terbentuknya teori mengenai partisipasi masyarakat. Varshney menunjukkan adanya hubungan yang kuat antara struktur komunitas plural dan masyarakat sipil dengan ada atau tidaknya kekerasan komunal. Jika civic engagement hanya terwujud dalam suatu komunitas, sementara hubungan antar-kelompok lemah atau tidak ada sama sekali, maka kemungkinan besar akan terjadi kekerasan komunal. Dalam konteks konflik antara komunitas Sunni dan Syiah, tidak terdapat unsur yang mendukung dalam penciptaan civic engagement dalam masyarakat Madura yang sedang berkonflik. Hal lain yang menyebabkan civic engagement sulit diwujudkan pada masyarakat Madura adalah adanya patron-client antara pemuka agama dan tokoh masyarakat dengan masyarakat. | 144 Affaf Mujahidah – Eksistensi Civic Engagement dan Elite Integration dalam Konflik Sunni-Syiah tokoh agama dijunjung tinggi.[10] Di daerah yang berkonflik tersebut juga memiliki kesamaan kultural karena memang pada prinsipnya para penduduk berasal dari satu etnis (Madura) dan berada dalam satu wilayah sehingga kultur yang berkembang pun sama
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
