Abstract

Objective: This study compares different surface conditioning methods applied to various composite surfaces in order to investigate the possible effects on composite-ceramic bond strength. It was aimed to increase the bond strength between flowable composite which is frequently used in the immediate dentin sealing procedure and ceramic surfaces. Material and Methods: Eighty flowable composite and eighty conventional composite discs were prepared with five different surface conditioning methods applied to the discs. The folllowing treatments were applied to the discs: orthophosphoric acid, air-flow, bur conditioning, Er:YAG laser irradition and an unconditioned control group. The composite disc surface roughness was measured with a profilometer. Composite and ceramic (Glass-ceramic blocks, e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Liechtenstein) discs were then bonded with an adhesive resin cement. The shear bonding test was performed with an universal tester. Results: There was no statistical difference between the conditioning methods applied to flowable composites in terms of bond strength (p>0.05). However, a statistically significant difference was found between the conditioning methods applied to conventional composites regarding bond strength (p<0.05). The highest mean bond strength value was observed with ER:YAG laser conditioned conventional composites and was significantly higher than laser irradiated flowable composite groups. Conclusion: Our data shows that similar bond strength values are obtained when using either flowable or conventional composite resins. In addition, both conventional and flowable composite resins require surface conditioning to achieve reliable adhesion to porcelain material.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call