Einstein's Paradox

Abstract

IN his review of Bergson's new book (NATURE, October 14) Prof. Wildon Carr refers to “Einstein's paradox,” which he quotes in inverted commas as follows:—“Suppose a traveller to be enclosed in a cannon-ball and projected from the earth with a velocity amounting to a twenty-thousandth of the velocity of light; suppose him to meet a star and be returned to earth; he will find when he leaves the cannon-ball that if he has been absent two years, the world in his absence has aged two hundred years.” It so happens that a paradox of this identical kind was proposed to Einstein himself by M. Painleve at the Paris conferences in April of this year. Unless I have greatly misunderstood Einstein's reply, as recorded by M. Nordmann in the Revue des Deux Mondes of May 1, this particular paradox, arising from the imaginary departure and return of an observer travelling with great speed from a given point and back again, was shown to be one not legitimately derivable from the restricted theory—the theoretical construction is not one to which the transformation formulae can properly be applied (PP. 146–152).