Abstract
A total of 207 patients undergoing breast conserving therapy (BCT, excision of tumour with clear margins, radiotherapy, sequential chemotherapy for node-positive patients) were clinically evaluated after a median follow-up of 11 months (min 2/max 22). The aim of the study was to analyse the impact of various individual factors, surgical techniques and adjuvant therapies on the cosmetic result. In 85.7% of all cases the objective outcome was satisfactory (very good: 48.8%, good: 36.9%) and in 14.3% unsatisfactory (fair: 13%, poor: 1.3%). Objective cosmetic results were rated significantly better by the patients (p = 0.01), in cases with biopsy weights of greater than 100 grms. (large/hyperplastic breast, p = 0.01), non-reconstructed mammary glands (simply closure of subcutis and skin, p = 0.01), non suction drainage of the breast (p - 0.04) and normal healing of the wound (p = 0.01). There was a trend towards better cosmetic results in the premenopause in patients with a tumour localised in the upper outer quadrant, in cases of a curvilinear as compared to a radial incision (upper/outer quadrant) and in small or average-sized breasts with biopsy weights of less than 50 grms. Cosmetic results were unaffected by a "two-step" procedure, standardised postoperative radiotherapy (45-55 Gy) and by sequential chemotherapy (3x CHT/radiotherapy/3x CHT). Unsatisfactory cosmetic short-term results should primarily be regarded as a surgical complication of BCT. Results can be improved by taking into consideration the importance of the relation of breast/biopsy-weight as well as standardising the operative procedure (curvilinear incision, closure of subcutis and skin, drainage without suction, perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have