Abstract

Vasodilator drugs are increasingly being discussed as possible antiglaucomatous substances. Aim of the present study is to evaluate, from a hemodynamic point of view, the vasodilator drug isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) regarding its suitability for glaucoma therapy. 20 healthy subjects (mean age: 28 yrs) volunteered to participate in the study. In randomized order, each subject received one tablet containing 40 mg ISDN (sequels) or--in a second trial--one tablet placebo (+500 mg of the analgetic metamizol, respectively, for prophylaxis of nitrate headache). 1 h before as well as 1, 3, 5, and 7 hrs after medication, the following variables were determined using oculo-oscillo-dynamography: systolic ophthalmic artery pressure (SOAP), systolic ocular perfusion pressure (SOPP), ocular pulsation amplitude (OPA) and the product OPA x heart rate (HR). Intraocular pressure (IOP) as well as systolic and diastolic brachial artery pressures (SBAP, DBAP) were also measured. After administration of ISDN (+analgetic), the variables SBAP, SOAP and SOPP were significantly (p = 0.01) lowered compared to placebo (+analgetic), and also the IOP tended to be lower (p = 0.08). The maximum reduction was found 3-5 hrs after medication: SBAP 10.9 mm Hg (9%), SOAP 12.5 mm Hg (14%), SOPP 11.3 mm Hg (14.5%), and IOP 1.5 mm Hg (12%). The relation SOAP vs. SBAP was significantly (p = 0.0004) linear, the correlation coefficient amounted to 0.39. DBAP remained unchanged, HR was increased by 4-7 beats/min (p = 0.08). OPA and the product OPA x HR showed highly significant decreases by maximum values of 44% and 40%, respectively. ISDN (+analgetic) caused a reduction of SOAP and SOPP, which can be accounted for by the reduced systolic systemic blood pressure. In addition, there was a decrease of OPA and of the product OPA x HR (a measure of pulsatile ocular blood flow), which finding may be explained by a cardiac stroke volume reduction that is typical for nitrates. Due to these hemodynamic effects and due to the only weak IOP reduction, ISDN does not appear to be suitable for glaucoma therapy.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.