Abstract

BackgroundThere is evidence that genes and their protein products are organized into functional modules according to cellular processes and pathways. Gene co-expression networks have been used to describe the relationships between gene transcripts. Ample literature exists on how to detect biologically meaningful modules in networks but there is a need for methods that allow one to study the relationships between modules.ResultsWe show that network methods can also be used to describe the relationships between co-expression modules and present the following methodology. First, we describe several methods for detecting modules that are shared by two or more networks (referred to as consensus modules). We represent the gene expression profiles of each module by an eigengene. Second, we propose a method for constructing an eigengene network, where the edges are undirected but maintain information on the sign of the co-expression information. Third, we propose methods for differential eigengene network analysis that allow one to assess the preservation of network properties across different data sets. We illustrate the value of eigengene networks in studying the relationships between consensus modules in human and chimpanzee brains; the relationships between consensus modules in brain, muscle, liver, and adipose mouse tissues; and the relationships between male-female mouse consensus modules and clinical traits. In some applications, we find that module eigengenes can be organized into higher level clusters which we refer to as meta-modules.ConclusionEigengene networks can be effective and biologically meaningful tools for studying the relationships between modules of a gene co-expression network. The proposed methods may reveal a higher order organization of the transcriptome. R software tutorials, the data, and supplementary material can be found at the following webpage: .

Highlights

  • There is evidence that genes and their protein products are organized into functional modules according to cellular processes and pathways

  • In this work we present methods a) for finding consensus modules across multiple networks, b) for describing the relationship between consensus modules, and c) for assessing whether the relationship between consensus modules is preserved across different networks

  • We find no significant correlation between consensus module eigengenes and the traits

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There is evidence that genes and their protein products are organized into functional modules according to cellular processes and pathways. Gene co-expression networks have been used to describe the relationships between gene transcripts. Gene co-expression networks constructed from gene expression microarray data capture the relationships between transcripts [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. From the point of view of individual genes ('from below'), modules are groups of highly interconnected genes that may form a biological pathway. From the point of view of systems biology ('from above'), functional modules bridge the gap between individual (page number not for citation purposes). We find that co-expression modules may form a biologically meaningful meta-network that reveals a higher-order organization of the transcriptome. We refer to modules in a meta-network of modules as meta-modules

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call