Abstract

AbstractWe review past and recent literature on how egocentrism shapes moral judgements. We focus on mechanisms by which egocentric evaluations appear to people as objective, impartial and morally right. We also show that people seem to be unaware of these biases and suggest that understanding how egocentrism impacts moral judgements demands studying morality embedded in a specific social context rather than the social void created in a laboratory. Finally, we argue that egocentric biases in moral judgements are not easily overcome and persist even if people deliberately try to omit attitudes in their judgements or if morally relevant information is present. We conclude that egocentric evaluations triggered by such factors as personal and group interests or attitudes may lay at the core of moral judgements of others because they help maintain a strategic social and personal relationships.

Highlights

  • We don't see things as they are, we see them as we are (Anaïs Nin, 1961).People experience the world through their preferences, values, background and expectations

  • Egocentrism has been postulated as a source of bias in moral cognition too (Epley & Caruso, 2004; Moore & Loewenstein, 2004), for many years, it was neglected in empirical moral psychology

  • Analysis of the participants' moral judgements revealed a strong influence of norms and only a weak, secondary role of personal gain, suggesting that people's automatic evaluations were corrected to align with current norms (Bocian & Wojciszke, 2014b; Study 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We don't see things as they are, we see them as we are (Anaïs Nin, 1961).People experience the world through their preferences, values, background and expectations. In their last laboratory experiment, Bocian and Wojciszke (2014a) tested the attitude formation hypothesis by manipulating whether participants initially disliked or liked a wrongdoing partner and found that when positive attitude formation had been blocked (as well as automatic evaluation), the participants' moral judgements were freed from egocentrically biased interpretations.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call