Abstract

By what capacities do human beings engage in intentional action? Humeans about motivation claim that the source of all action is desire. Volitionalists claim that action has two distinct sources, one in the will and one in desire. Recent work suggests that volitionalism has some empirical support. Roy F. Baumeister and colleagues have argued for a phenomenon called “ego depletion”. They argue that some aspect of the self exerts volition in a number of different contexts. The main evidence for this claim is that experimental subjects who engage in acts of self-regulation are less likely to engage in similar actions on later tests. The evidence calls for a reformulation of the Humean theory, not a rejection of it. And the reformulation is one that still has interest for metaethics. Many philosophers are interested in the Humean theory of motivation because they believe that it has implications for the correct theory of normative practical reasons. Here I argue that if the Humean theory of motivation was ever a threat to the objectivity of morality, it still is.

Highlights

  • By what capacities do human beings engage in intentional action? Humeans about motivation claim that the source of all action is desire

  • Volitionalists claim that action has two distinct sources

  • Action is often produced by desire, but it is sometimes the product of the will

Read more

Summary

Introduction

By what capacities do human beings engage in intentional action? Humeans about motivation claim that the source of all action is desire. They argue that this aspect of the self is distinct from desires because it becomes depleted even when the domains of action are very different. Many philosophers are interested in the Humean theory of motivation because they believe it has implications for the correct theory of normative practical reasons. I will put these issues to one side and argue that if the Humean theory of motivation was ever a threat to the objectivity of morality, it still is This is because that while evidence for ego depletion is evidence for a source of motivation distinct from desire, it is not evidence for a will that can function to change the content of one’s desires. A close examination of the evidence undermines some of the common sense support for volitionalism

The Humean Theory
The Empirical Research
The Implications of the Findings
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call