Abstract

AbstractPrecise measurements of fiber break regions have been made during the single fiber fragmentation test (SFFT) procedure on E‐glass/diglycidyl ether of bisphenol‐A (DGEBA)/meta‐phenylenediamine (m‐PDA) test specimens. From these measurements, the location and size of each fiber fragment was determined, and the resulting information was used to construct fragmentation maps of the tested fiber. By comparing these maps, the fragmentation process supports random fragmentation along the length of the fiber. Since the interfacial shear strength (IFSS) or the interfacial shear stress transfer coefficient (I‐STC) is obtained from the fragment length data at the end of the test (saturation), frequency histograms of the fragment length data were constructed to determine the repeatability of the fragmentation process. Since the SFFT is performed by sequential step‐strains of the test specimen, test protocols were developed by controlling the step size of each strain increment and the time between each step‐strain (dwell time). For the testing protocols used in this research, the E‐glass/DGEBA/m‐PDA frequency histograms of the fragment lengths were found to be generally repeatable. However, when the effective strain rate of the test was altered by changing the dwell time between strain increments, the fragment distribution at saturation of the E‐glass/DGEBA/m‐PDA SFFT specimens changed. The direction of the change was found to be inconsistent with the effect one might expect when only the nonlinear viscoelastic behavior of the matrix is considered. However, the magnitude of the change observed in the E‐glass/DGEBA/m‐PDA SFFT specimens is not universal. Fragmentation data obtained on E‐glass/polyisocyanurate SFFT specimens revealed a much smaller change in fragment length distributions with the same change in testing protocols. Consistent with the results obtained on the E‐glass/DGEBA/m‐PDA, fiber fragmentation occurs when the polyisocyanurate matrix exhibits nonlinear viscoelastic behavior. The implication of these results for interfacial shear strength measurements is discussed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.