EFL in Argentina's Schools: Teachers' Perspectives on Policy Changes and Instruction

Abstract

pubs97/web/97451 .asp. Native American Languages Act of 1990, Public Law 101-477. (1990). Retrieved August 3, 2007, from http://www.nabe. org/documents/policy_legislation/ NALanguagesAc ts . pdf . Native American Languages Act of 1992, Public Law 102-524. (1992). Retrived August 3, 2007, from http://www.nabe. org/documents/policy_legislation/ NALanguagesAc ts . pdf. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Public Law No. 107-110. (2002). Title III. Language instruction for limited English proficient and immigrant students. Retrieved July 31, 2007, from http^/www.ncela.gwu.edu/pubs/legislation/nclb/nclb-iii.pdf. Romero-Little, M. E., & McCarty, T. L. (2006). Language planning challenges and prospects in Native American communities and schools. Tempe: Arizona State University Education Policy Studies Laboratory. Retrieved January 6, 2006, from http:// edpolicylab.org. Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.; pp. 435-454). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Thomas, W. P., & Collier, V. (1997). School effectiveness for language minority students. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education. Wilson, W., & Kamana, K. (2001). Mai loko mai o ka Tni: Proceeding from a dream. The 'Aha Punana Leo connection in Hawaiian language revitalization. In L. Hinton 8c K. Hale (Eds.), The green book of language revitalization in practice (pp. 147-176). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Wong Fillmore, L. (2000). Loss of family languages: Should educators be concerned? Theory into Practice, 39, 203-210.