Eficacia del tratamiento de rehabilitación para el síndrome del túnel carpiano: un ensayo clínico controlado aleatorizado

Abstract

Introduction and objectiveCarpal tunnel syndrome is the most common median nerve mononeuropathy. There are multiple conservative treatments, invasive (corticoid injections [CI]) and non-invasive (splinting, therapeutic ultrasound [TUS], laser, exercise). However, the treatment choice is controversial. The aim was to determine the efficacy of conservative treatment to improve the clinical and electrophysiological evaluations. MethodsOutpatients referred whit carpal tunnel syndrome clinical diagnosis to perform nerve conduction study (NCS) were included, without chronic or metabolic diseases that affect the peripheral nerves, without carpal tunnel syndrome treatment and with mild or moderate axonotmesis or neuropraxia in NCS baseline. Patients who signed informed consent forms were randomized in three treatment groups (Group 1: TUS+splint; Group 2: CI+splint and Group 3: TUS+CI+splint) were referred for clinical evaluations. The NCS was performed in each patient at baseline, fourth and eighth weeks by the same physiatrist and the clinical evaluations were performed at baseline and the final follow-up. ResultsThirty patients were included; mean age was 50.7±7.5 years and all of them females, without differences in NCS or clinical variables in the baseline evaluations. All groups exhibited improvement in some clinical and electrophysiological variables in the final evaluation, though only group 3 showed improvement on median/ulnar nerves sensory peak latency difference (1.2±0.4 vs. 0.4±0.4; p=0.001) starting in week four. ConclusionsThe conservative treatment in patients with CTS improves NCS and clinical variables, including the most sensitive electrophysiological test (medial/ulnar difference), though if we combined three treatments (splint+TUS+CI), the improvement was found to be faster and remarkable.