Abstract

Assessment of earthquake hazard is improved if geological and geodetic data are included in addition to seismological data. In earthquake regions like Japan and California, palaeoseismology combines data from geology and seismology, and networks of permanent GPS (global positioning system) stations situated on bedrock supplement the networks of seismographs. A combination of seismographs and GPS stations on ice is also used in current studies of glacial earthquakes in Greenland. In Denmark only broad-scale geodetic coverage is available (Khan et al. 2005) and only a few examples of geological input are found in the literature. However, more thorough geodetic evaluations of deformations are currently made in Nordic co-operation projects and we are looking forward to learn about the results. Also the number of permanent GPS stations in Denmark has recently been increased from 3 to 13. The geological input is limited but may hold some potential, and the aim of this article is to evaluate this. We also discuss new investigations of recent geological movements, both in projects on post-glacial uplift (and accompanying horizontal deformation) of Scandinavia, and more locally of geological indicators of uplift in selected areas. As seismologists, we are interested in a homogeneous evaluation of geological indicators in all of Denmark and its neighbouring areas.

Highlights

  • Assessment of earthquake hazard is improved if geological and geodetic data are included in addition to seismological data

  • We have evaluated and discussed a number of reports on geological or geodetic indications of earthquake activity in Denmark

  • We found no signs of geologically recent faulting or recent crustal deformation. This corroborates that Denmark and its neighbouring areas are characterised by a small earthquake potential

Read more

Summary

Discussion of selected areas

Copenhagen – This fault is one of the most significant faults in the Copenhagen area (Rosenkrantz 1937; Nielsen & Thybo 2004), and it has been very important for the Carlsberg brewery because large quantities of water could be extracted from the fault zone for brewing beer. We consider it unlikely that deformation occurred in 1930 as suggsted by Rosenkrantz (1937) since no movements were registered between 1911 and 1933. Another base line on Amager (in Danish called ‘prøvebane’, trial distance) has been reported as deformed (Ovesen et al 2002). In this case the geodetic problem was identified from observations which showed that there were problems with the end point as mentioned above.

Succession of beaches
Discussion and conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call