Abstract

Effort during listening is commonly measured using the task-evoked pupil response (TEPR); a pupillometric marker of physiological arousal. However, studies to date report no association between TEPR and perceived effort. One possible reason for this is the way in which self-report effort measures are typically administered, namely as a single data point collected at the end of a testing session. Another possible reason is that TEPR might relate more closely to the experience of tiredness from listening than to effort per se. To examine these possibilities, we conducted two preregistered experiments that recorded subjective ratings of effort and tiredness from listening at multiple time points and examined their covariance with TEPR over the course of listening tasks varying in levels of acoustic and attentional demand. In both experiments, we showed a within-subject association between TEPR and tiredness from listening, but no association between TEPR and effort. The data also suggest that the effect of task difficulty on the experience of tiredness from listening may go undetected using the traditional approach of collecting a single data point at the end of a listening block. Finally, this study demonstrates the utility of a novel correlation analysis technique ("rmcorr"), which can be used to overcome statistical power constraints commonly found in the literature. Teasing apart the subjective and physiological mechanisms that underpin effortful listening is a crucial step toward addressing these difficulties in older and/or hearing-impaired individuals.

Highlights

  • Understanding speech in everyday environments is fraught with challenges arising from a variety of sources, including the level and/or type of interfering acoustic signals present as well as the sensory-cognitive profile of the listener (Mattys et al, 2012)

  • Repeated or sustained episodes of effortful listening may lead to an exacerbated sense of tiredness or fatigue

  • It is important to emphasize that, we found no evidence of an association between effort ratings and task-evoked pupil response (TEPR), this does not mean that TEPR cannot provide useful information pertaining to effortful listening; we would argue the opposite

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Understanding speech in everyday environments is fraught with challenges arising from a variety of sources, including the level and/or type of interfering acoustic signals present as well as the sensory-cognitive profile of the listener (Mattys et al, 2012). There is growing interest in uncovering ways to measure not just an individual's ability to recognize speech, and the cognitive effort required to achieve this goal This is often referred to as “listening effort”; defined recently as “the deliberate allocation ofresources to overcome obstacles in goal pursuit when carrying out a (listening) task.” (Pichora-Fuller et al, 2016). Repeated or sustained episodes of effortful listening may lead to an exacerbated sense of tiredness or fatigue. The types of measures commonly used to extract information relating to effortful listening vary from subjective measures (e.g., self-report questionnaires) to behavioral (e.g., response times) and physiological (e.g., measuring brain activity either directly or indirectly)

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.