Abstract

Many animal populations are subject to hunting or fishing in the wild. Detailed knowledge of demographic parameters (e.g. survival, reproduction) and temporal dynamics of such populations is crucial for sustainable management. Despite their relevance for management decisions, structure and size of exploited populations are often not known, and data limited. Recently, joint analysis of different types of demographic data, such as population counts, reproductive data and capture–mark–recapture data, within integrated population models (IPMs) has gained much popularity as it may allow estimating population size and structure, as well as key demographic rates, while fully accounting for uncertainty. IPMs built so far for exploited populations have typically been built as age‐structured population models. However, the age of harvested individuals is usually difficult and/or costly to assess and therefore often not available. Here, we introduce an IPM structured by body size classes, which allows making efficient use of data commonly available in exploited populations for which accurate information on age is often missing. The model jointly analyzes size‐at‐harvest data, capture–mark–recapture–recovery data and reproduction data from necropsies, and we illustrate its applicability in a case study involving heavily hunted wild boar. This species has increased in abundance over the last decades despite intense harvest, and the IPM analysis provides insights into the roles of natural mortality, body growth, maturation schedules and reproductive output in compensating for the loss of individuals to hunting. Early maturation and high reproductive output contributed to wild boar population persistence despite a strong hunting pressure. We thus demonstrate the potential of size‐class‐structured IPMs as tools to investigate the dynamics of exploited populations with limited information on age, and highlight both the applicability of this framework to other species and its potential for follow‐up analyses highly relevant to management.

Highlights

  • Many animal populations are affected by commercial, recreational or subsistence harvest (Lebreton 2005, Peres 2010, Ripple et al 2016), i.e. by the removal of individuals through hunting or fishing

  • We focused on wild boar as a case study, the approach we propose can be reliably used for assessing population dynamics of a large range of vertebrate populations subjected to human exploitation

  • We present estimates of our integrated population model (IPM) for parameters associated with demographic rates, population-level properties and detection, as well as conclusions from model assessment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many animal populations are affected by commercial, recreational or subsistence harvest (Lebreton 2005, Peres 2010, Ripple et al 2016), i.e. by the removal of individuals through hunting or fishing. Models designed to assess interactive effects of harvest and other stressors on population dynamics and to predict sustainability of harvest management typically require detailed information on demographic parameters (e.g. survival, reproduction) and population size. These quantities are challenging to estimate in absence of detailed long-term data (Clutton-Brock and Sheldon 2010). Péron et al (2010) estimated dispersal rate in a black-headed gull Chroicocephalus ridibundus population at the regional scale, a parameter notoriously difficult to assess Another striking example of demographic parameter difficult to estimate is immigration, which can be quantified through the use of IPMs (Abadi et al 2010b)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call