Abstract
AbstractA local‐volatility (LV) model captures the volatility smile while retaining the preference freedom of the Black–Scholes model. Past attempts to construct a smile‐consistent tree for the LV surface do not guarantee validity. This paper presents an efficient and valid smile‐consistent tree for the LV model. The only assumption is that the LV surface be upper‐ and lower‐bounded. With this tree, double‐barrier options can be priced with fast convergence even in the presence of volatility smile. This is confirmed numerically. An implied tree is also presented. It recovers the LV surface reasonably well.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Paper version not known
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
