Abstract

Numerical tools are required to improve our understanding of tribological experiments. In order to represent all the details of rough surface contacts, such calculations require many grid points. Hence, high-performance tools are necessary to obtain precision and limit computing time and memory requirement. This article compares the precision, convergence speed, computing time, memory requirement, and robustness of two solvers for three different cases: a smooth Hertzian contact, a wavy Hertzian contact, and a rough Hertzian contact. The first solver is based around the conjugate gradient method and the deformation integrals are computed using the fast Fourier transform (FFT). The second solver is based on the distributed Gauss–Seidel relaxation, using multigrid (MG) techniques to accelerate convergence and multilevel multi integration (MLMI) for a fast computation of the deformation. The overall conclusion is that the MG method excels in terms of computing speed and memory requirement, whereas the FFT-based code excels in robustness and implementation time.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.