Abstract

Accelerated searches, made possible by machine learning techniques, are of growing interest in materials discovery. A suitable case involves the solution processing of components that ultimately form thin films of solar cell materials known as hybrid organic–inorganic perovskites (HOIPs). The number of molecular species that combine in solution to form these films constitutes an overwhelmingly large “compositional” space (at times, exceeding 500,000 possible combinations). Selecting a HOIP with desirable characteristics involves choosing different cations, halides, and solvent blends from a diverse palette of options. An unguided search by experimental investigations or molecular simulations is prohibitively expensive. In this work, we propose a Bayesian optimization method that uses an application-specific kernel to overcome challenges where data is scarce, and in which the search space is given by binary variables indicating whether a constituent is present or not. We demonstrate that the proposed approach identifies HOIPs with the targeted maximum intermolecular binding energy between HOIP salt and solvent at considerably lower cost than previous state-of-the-art Bayesian optimization methodology and at a fraction of the time (less than 10%) needed to complete an exhaustive search. We find an optimal composition within 15 ± 10 iterations in a HOIP compositional space containing 72 combinations, and within 31 ± 9 iterations when considering mixed halides (240 combinations). Exhaustive quantum mechanical simulations of all possible combinations were used to validate the optimal prediction from a Bayesian optimization approach. This paper demonstrates the potential of the Bayesian optimization methodology reported here for new materials discovery.

Highlights

  • Hybrid organic–inorganic perovskites (HOIPs) are an exciting class of emergent materials that exhibit extremely promising photovoltaic (PV) properties.[1]

  • Despite intense experimental scrutiny of many combinations of these species and different solvent processing protocols, there is no way to know whether a currently untested, but higher performing, material might exist, one comprised of an alternative combination of A-site cation, B-site cation, halide, and solvent blend. We illustrate this combinatorial growth of the search space: Suppose we choose our HOIP candidate from among three A-site cations (MA, FA, Cs), one B-site cation (Pb), three X-site halides, all of which are constrained by 10% increments (e.g., MA0.9Cs0.1 is allowed, but not MA0.99Cs0.01), and allowing binary blends of solvents

  • The improvement to Bayesian optimization using our Linear Belief categorical variables, making it eligible to optimize over combinatorial spaces. pySMAC employs the expected improvement acquisition criterion. ● Simple BO follows a standard approach in Bayesian optimization and uses a standard Gaussian process (GP) model combined with the expected improvement acquisition function

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Hybrid organic–inorganic perovskites (HOIPs) are an exciting class of emergent materials that exhibit extremely promising photovoltaic (PV) properties.[1]. Despite intense experimental scrutiny of many combinations of these species and different solvent processing protocols, there is no way to know whether a currently untested, but higher performing, material might exist, one comprised of an alternative combination of A-site cation, B-site cation, halide, and solvent blend. We illustrate this combinatorial growth of the search space: Suppose we choose our HOIP candidate from among three A-site cations (MA, FA, Cs), one B-site cation (Pb), three X-site halides, all of which are constrained by 10% increments (e.g., MA0.9Cs0.1 is allowed, but not MA0.99Cs0.01), and allowing binary blends of solvents (from a reduced list of only eight solvent choices) of. A good starting objective for validation purposes would be the limiting case of the enthalpy of solvation: the intermolecular binding energy between a perovskite salt (ABX3) and a pure solvent (S0)

RESULTS
Method
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call