Abstract
Intra-group transfers are risk management tools that are usually widely used to optimise the risk position of an insurance group. In this paper, it is shown that premium and liability transfers could be optimally made in such a way as to reduce the amount of Technical Provisions and Minimum Capital Requirement for the entire insurance conglomerate. These levels of required capital represent the minimal amount that needs to be held by the insurance group without regulator intervention, according to the Solvency II regulation. We assume that only proportional risk transfers are feasible, since such transfers are not difficult to administer for a large scaled insurance group, as is always the case. In addition, any risk shifting should be made for commercial purposes in order to be considered acceptable by the local regulators that impose restrictions on how much the assets within an insurance group are fungible. Our numerical examples illustrate the efficiency of the optimal proportional risk transfers which can easily be implemented, in terms of computation, in any well-known solver even for an insurance conglomerate with many subsidiaries. We found that our proposed optimal proportional allocations are more beneficial for large insurance group, since the relative reduction in capital requirement tends to be small, whereas the gain in absolute terms is quite significant for large scaled insurance group.
Highlights
An insurance group (IG) is composed of multiple legal entities, known as insurance undertakings (IU’s), that may operate under different regulation regimes
Minimum Capital Requirement (MCR) is assumed to lie between 20% and 50% of the corresponding individual Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR), which has been confirmed by empirical evidence accumulated in the results of the QIS5 among the European Union (EU) IG’s, when the Standard formula of Solvency II was implemented
We have translated the capital requirements for a non-life insurance company operating under Solvency II into mathematical form and considered the problem of determining the efficient allocation of risk across lines of business (LOB’s) by following the most recent Solvency II recommendations summarised in QIS5
Summary
An insurance group (IG) is composed of multiple legal entities, known as insurance undertakings (IU’s), that may operate under different regulation regimes. Note that some non-life businesses, such as health insurance or workers’ compensation, are similar in nature to life insurance activities from the regulatory point of view, and the capital requirements follow the life insurance evaluation. These hybrid businesses are excluded from our analysis, so that we could better understand the risk transfer effects within a pure non-life IG. Optimising the risk intra-group transfers represents a practical problem that has not been discussed much in the framework of Solvency II, but there exists a rich literature on similar problems that exhibit a reduced level of complexity.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.