Abstract

This research addresses the problem of the optimal placement and sizing of (PV) sources in medium voltage distribution grids through the application of the recently developed Newton metaheuristic optimization algorithm (NMA). The studied problem is formulated through a mixed-integer nonlinear programming model where the binary variables regard the installation of a PV source in a particular node, and the continuous variables are associated with power generations as well as the voltage magnitudes and angles, among others. To improve the performance of the NMA, we propose the implementation of a discrete–continuous codification where the discrete component deals with the location problem and the continuous component works with the sizing problem of the PV sources. The main advantage of the NMA is that it works based on the first and second derivatives of the fitness function considering an evolution formula that contains its current solution (xit) and the best current solution (xbest), where the former one allows location exploitation and the latter allows the global exploration of the solution space. To evaluate the fitness function and its derivatives, the successive approximation power flow method was implemented, which became the proposed solution strategy in a master–slave optimizer, where the master stage is governed by the NMA and the slave stage corresponds to the power flow method. Numerical results in the IEEE 34- and IEEE 85-bus systems show the effectiveness of the proposed optimization approach to minimize the total annual operative costs of the network when compared to the classical Chu and Beasley genetic algorithm and the MINLP solvers available in the general algebraic modeling system with reductions of 26.89% and 27.60% for each test feeder with respect to the benchmark cases.

Highlights

  • The remainder of this document is organized as follows: Section 2 presents the complete mathematical optimization model that describes the problem of the optimal placement and location of PV sources considering an economic objective function indicator based on the investments in PV sources and energy purchasing costs at the substation bus; Section 3 presents the theoretical derivation of the Newton metaheuristic optimization algorithm to solve combinatorial problems; Section 4 shows the main characteristics of the IEEE 34- and IEEE 85-node test feeders including their branch and load parameters as well as the daily behaviors of the demand at the substation terminal and the PV generation profile; Section 5 describes all the numerical validations and comparisons of the proposed

  • Optimizer, the comparative DCCBGA, and the solution reached by the proposed Newton metaheuristic optimization algorithm (NMA) in the IEEE 34-node test feeder

  • Continuous codification, where the discrete component was associated with the nodes and the continuous part with the assigned PV sizes; in the slave stage, each combination provided by the NMA was evaluated using the successive approximation power flow approach

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The remainder of this document is organized as follows: Section 2 presents the complete mathematical optimization model that describes the problem of the optimal placement and location of PV sources considering an economic objective function indicator based on the investments in PV sources and energy purchasing costs at the substation bus; Section 3 presents the theoretical derivation of the Newton metaheuristic optimization algorithm to solve combinatorial problems; Section 4 shows the main characteristics of the IEEE 34- and IEEE 85-node test feeders including their branch and load parameters as well as the daily behaviors of the demand at the substation terminal and the PV generation profile; Section 5 describes all the numerical validations and comparisons of the proposed.

Mathematical Formulation
Objective Function Formulation
Set of Constraints
Model Interpretation
Methodology of Solution
Master Stage
Slave Stage
General Solution Flow Chart
Evaluation ends?
Test Feeders
Proposed work implementation
IEEE 85-Node Test Feeder
IEEE-85
PV Curve and Objective Function Parametrization
Numerical Validation and Discussion
Evaluation of the fitness function
Results in the IEEE 34-Node Test Feeder
Method
Results in the IEEE 85-Node Test Feeder
Additional Results
Conclusions and Future Works
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.