Abstract

Non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS) enzymes form modular assembly-lines, wherein each module governs the incorporation of a specific monomer into a short peptide product. Modules are comprised of one or more key domains, including adenylation (A) domains, which recognise and activate the monomer substrate; condensation (C) domains, which catalyse amide bond formation; and thiolation (T) domains, which shuttle reaction intermediates between catalytic domains. This arrangement offers prospects for rational peptide modification via substitution of substrate-specifying domains. For over 20 years, it has been considered that C domains play key roles in proof-reading the substrate; a presumption that has greatly complicated rational NRPS redesign. Here we present evidence from both directed and natural evolution studies that any substrate-specifying role for C domains is likely to be the exception rather than the rule, and that novel non-ribosomal peptides can be generated by substitution of A domains alone. We identify permissive A domain recombination boundaries and show that these allow us to efficiently generate modified pyoverdine peptides at high yields. We further demonstrate the transferability of our approach in the PheATE-ProCAT model system originally used to infer C domain substrate specificity, generating modified dipeptide products at yields that are inconsistent with the prevailing dogma.

Highlights

  • Non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS) enzymes form modular assembly-lines, wherein each module governs the incorporation of a specific monomer into a short peptide product

  • The earliest reported attempts to create artificial nonribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS) enzymes were substitutions of A-T domains into the second and seventh modules of the NRPSs involved in the biosynthesis of the lipopeptide surfactin[1,2]

  • We show that our previous failure to generate modified pyoverdines by A domain substitution is surmountable by use of more effective recombination boundaries, and that the C domains in the pyoverdine NRPS system do not impose stringent proofreading constraints

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS) enzymes form modular assembly-lines, wherein each module governs the incorporation of a specific monomer into a short peptide product. Modules are comprised of one or more key domains, including adenylation (A) domains, which recognise and activate the monomer substrate; condensation (C) domains, which catalyse amide bond formation; and thiolation (T) domains, which shuttle reaction intermediates between catalytic domains This arrangement offers prospects for rational peptide modification via substitution of substrate-specifying domains. Evidence that C domains exhibit stringent specificity toward the acceptor substrate activated by their cognate (downstream) A domains offered an explanation for the reduced yields[3,4] This evidence was based on NRPS enzymes artificially loaded with amino-acyl CoA or aminoacyl-N-acetylcysteamine thioesters, which mimic an amino acid attached to a T domain. Non-synonymous C-A domain substitutions generated modified pyoverdines in three out of ten cases, suggesting that a C domain with compatible acceptor site specificity was required for functionality[9,15,16]. We show that we can incorporate leucine as the acceptor residue in the tyrocidine PheATE/ProCAT dimodular NRPS model (Fig. 1b, d), which was previously found not to accept artificiallyloaded leucine thioesters at this position—a key observation underpinning the original hypothesis that C domains exhibit stringent selectivity for the acceptor substrate[3]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.