Abstract

Introduction. The integration of reliability and optimization concepts seeks to design structures that should be both economic and reliable. This model is called Reliability-Based Design Optimization (RBDO). In fact, the coupling between the mechanical modelling, the reliability analyses and the optimization methods leads to very high computational cost and weak convergence stability. Materials andMethods. Several methods have been developed to overcome these difficulties. The methods called Reliability Index Approach (RIA) and Performance Measure Approach (PMA) are two alternative methods. RIA describes the probabilistic constraint as a reliability index while PMA was proposed by converting the probability measure to a performance measure. An Optimum Safety Factor (OSF) method is proposed to compute safety factors satisfying a required reliability level without demanding additional computing cost for the reliability evaluation. The OSF equations are formulated considering RIA and PMA and extended to multiple failure case.Research Results. Several linear and nonlinear distribution laws are applied to composite yarns studies and then extended to multiple failure modes. It has been shown that the idea of the OSF method is to avoid the reliability constraint evaluation with a particular optimization process.Discussion and Conclusions. The simplified implementation framework of the OSF strategy consists of decoupling the optimization and the reliability analyses. It provides designers with efficient solutions that should be economic satisfying a required reliability level. It is demonstrated that the RBDO compared to OSF has several advantages: small number of optimization variables, good convergence stability, small computing time, satisfaction of the required reliability levels.

Highlights

  • The integration of reliability and optimization concepts seeks to design structures that should be both economic and reliable

  • It has been shown that the idea of the Optimum Safety Factor (OSF) method is to avoid the reliability constraint evaluation with a particular optimization process

  • From a reliability view point, Reliability-Based Design Optimization (RBDO) involves the evaluation of probabilistic constraints, which can be executed in two different ways: either using the Reliability Index Approach (RIA) or the Performance Measure Approach (PMA) [1]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

When Deterministic Design Optimization (DDO) methods are used, deterministic optimum designs are usually pushed to the design constraint boundary, leaving little or no room for tolerances (or uncertainties) in design, manufacture, and operating processes. The coupling between the mechanical modeling, the reliability analyses and the optimization methods leads to very high computational cost and weak convergence stability. To overcome these difficulties, two points of view have been considered. RBDO problem is more complex than that of deterministic design and may not lead to local optima To overcome both drawbacks, an Optimum Safety Factor (OSF) method has been proposed to compute safety factors satisfying a required reliability level without demanding additional computing cost for the reliability evaluation. An application on composite yarns is carried out for linear and nonlinear distribution laws and multiple failure modes (scenarios)

Reliability-Based Design Optimization
2: Reliability problem
OSF developments
OSF based on RIA
OSF based on PMA
OSF for component RBDO
Problem description
Procedures DDO procedure
Component RBDO
Design Point
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call