Abstract

In recent years, animal ethics issues have led researchers to explore nondestructive methods to access materials for genetic studies. Cicada exuviae are among those materials because they are cast skins that individuals left after molt and are easily collected. In this study, we aim to identify the most efficient extraction method to obtain high quantity and quality of DNA from cicada exuviae. We compared relative DNA yield and purity of six extraction protocols, including both manual protocols and available commercial kits, extracting from four different exoskeleton parts. Furthermore, amplification and sequencing of genomic DNA were evaluated in terms of availability of sequencing sequence at the expected genomic size. Both the choice of protocol and exuvia part significantly affected DNA yield and purity. Only samples that were extracted using the PowerSoil DNA Isolation kit generated gel bands of expected size as well as successful sequencing results. The failed attempts to extract DNA using other protocols could be partially explained by a low DNA yield from cicada exuviae and partly by contamination with humic acids that exist in the soil where cicada nymphs reside before emergence, as shown by spectroscopic measurements. Genomic DNA extracted from cicada exuviae could provide valuable information for species identification, allowing the investigation of genetic diversity across consecutive broods, or spatiotemporal variation among various populations. Consequently, we hope to provide a simple method to acquire pure genomic DNA applicable for multiple research purposes.

Highlights

  • Nondestructive sampling methods for DNA resources have recently attracted more attention from ethological, conservational, and population genetic studies

  • Other protocols could generate high DNA quantities (Fig. 4), only DNA samples extracted with the PowerSoil kit could be amplified via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) application (12 in a total of 40 samples)

  • The success of PCR and sequencing did not depend on the used exoskeleton parts

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Nondestructive sampling methods for DNA resources have recently attracted more attention from ethological, conservational, and population genetic studies. DNA extraction from specimens usually required scarifying essential sections of the insects such as leg, thorax, or head capsule. Such sampling methods could cause severe impacts on the species at both individual and population levels. Lethal sampling potentially decreases population size and alters population structure (Starks & Peters, 2002), which is harmful for the conservation of endangered species. Nondestructive sampling methods are in need for various genetic analyses (Châline, Ratnieks, Raine, Badcock, & Burke, 2004; Su et al, 2007)

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call