Abstract

Optical diffraction tomography relies on solving an inverse scattering problem governed by the wave equation. Classical reconstruction algorithms are based on linear approximations of the forward model (Born or Rytov), which limits their applicability to thin samples with low refractive-index contrasts. More recent works have shown the benefit of adopting nonlinear models. They account for multiple scattering and reflections, improving the quality of reconstruction. To reduce the complexity and memory requirements of these methods, we derive an explicit formula for the Jacobian matrix of the nonlinear Lippmann-Schwinger model which lends itself to an efficient evaluation of the gradient of the data-fidelity term. This allows us to deploy efficient methods to solve the corresponding inverse problem subject to sparsity constraints.

Highlights

  • Optical diffraction tomography (ODT) was introduced in [1] by E

  • It proceeds by solving an inverse scattering problem, where the scattering phenomenon is governed by the wave equation

  • It is worth noting that the scattering model, along with its associated inverse problem, is generic and not limited to optical diffraction tomography

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Optical diffraction tomography (ODT) was introduced in [1] by E. It is a microscopic technique that retrieves the distribution of refractive indices in biological samples out of holographic measurements of the scattered complex field produced when the sample is illuminated by an incident wave This method is of particular interest in biology because, contrarily to fluorescence imaging, it does not require any staining of the sample [2]. It is worth noting that the scattering model, along with its associated inverse problem, is generic and not limited to optical diffraction tomography. It is encountered in many other fields such as acoustics, microwave imaging, or radar applications [8]

From the wave equation to the Lippmann-Schwinger integral equation
Inverse ODT problem: prior work
Contributions
Formulation of the forward model
Common optimization strategy
Computation of proxγλR
Speedup strategies
Memory requirement
Numerical experiments
Simulation settings
Algorithm parameters
Metrics
Discussion
Real data
Conclusion
Proximity operator of R

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.