Abstract
Organisations are increasingly using artificial intelligence (AI). Where AI performs productive tasks more efficiently than humans, organisations will benefit economically through increases in productivity. However, if AI is deployed to undertake unproductive, superfluous tasks, the efficiency benefits will be reduced, even if these tasks are performed more efficiently than a human could, because the said tasks are inefficient to begin with. We call this eventuality ‘efficient inefficiency.’We outline several reasons why superfluous tasks are created by managers and why they persist in organisations, drawing on an array of behavioural, managerial, and sociological literature. We argue bounded rationality accounts for why managers often fail to identify superfluous tasks, coupled with organisational conflicts which often incentivise their creation. These factors impede the ability of organisations to avoid efficient inefficiency. Restructuring organisations to promote knowledge sharing and align stakeholder incentives may reduce, though not eliminate, the risk of efficient inefficiency.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.