Abstract

BackgroundMany recent studies that relax the assumption of independent evolution of sites have done so at the expense of a drastic increase in the number of substitution parameters. While additional parameters cannot be avoided to model context-dependent evolution, a large increase in model dimensionality is only justified when accompanied with careful model-building strategies that guard against overfitting. An increased dimensionality leads to increases in numerical computations of the models, increased convergence times in Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms and even more tedious Bayes Factor calculations.ResultsWe have developed two model-search algorithms which reduce the number of Bayes Factor calculations by clustering posterior densities to decide on the equality of substitution behavior in different contexts. The selected model's fit is evaluated using a Bayes Factor, which we calculate via model-switch thermodynamic integration. To reduce computation time and to increase the precision of this integration, we propose to split the calculations over different computers and to appropriately calibrate the individual runs. Using the proposed strategies, we find, in a dataset of primate Ancestral Repeats, that careful modeling of context-dependent evolution may increase model fit considerably and that the combination of a context-dependent model with the assumption of varying rates across sites offers even larger improvements in terms of model fit. Using a smaller nuclear SSU rRNA dataset, we show that context-dependence may only become detectable upon applying model-building strategies.ConclusionWhile context-dependent evolutionary models can increase the model fit over traditional independent evolutionary models, such complex models will often contain too many parameters. Justification for the added parameters is thus required so that only those parameters that model evolutionary processes previously unaccounted for are added to the evolutionary model. To obtain an optimal balance between the number of parameters in a context-dependent model and the performance in terms of model fit, we have designed two parameter-reduction strategies and we have shown that model fit can be greatly improved by reducing the number of parameters in a context-dependent evolutionary model.

Highlights

  • Many recent studies that relax the assumption of independent evolution of sites have done so at the expense of a drastic increase in the number of substitution parameters

  • The second dataset consists of 20 small subunit (SSU) rRNA genes, consists of 1,619 sites for each sequence and is analyzed using the 50% majority rule posterior consensus tree obtained under the general time-reversible model

  • The Ancestral Repeats dataset Approaches Compared To compare our Bayes Factor calculation approach with the original approach of Lartillot and Philippe [18], we have initially opted for a constant increment for and an equal number of Q updates for all the parameters and ancestral sites to estimate the log Bayes Factor and its error for the large Ancestral Repeats dataset

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many recent studies that relax the assumption of independent evolution of sites have done so at the expense of a drastic increase in the number of substitution parameters. The additional complexity of such models can lead to the identification of important evolutionary processes that would be missed with simpler models. Such discoveries may increase our understanding of molecular evolution. Using more accurate models may help to infer biological factors, such as phylogenetic topologies and branch lengths, more reliably. This may arise from the improved ability of those complex models to account for factors that simpler models neglect and whose influence on observed data might otherwise be misinterpreted [1]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call