Abstract

Smallholder farmers provide the foundation for food security in South Asia. However, increasing seasonal labor scarcity caused by rural out-migration has resulted in growing agricultural labor costs, presenting challenges to cash-constrained smallholder farmers that hire manual labor for land preparation, sowing, harvest and post-harvest operations. Technological innovations in small-scale agricultural machinery appropriate for the small field sizes and limited resource endowments of South Asia's farmers have been proposed as a potential solution to this problem. An increasing number of development initiatives also promote rural entrepreneurial approaches to mechanization, whereby smallholder farmers can access and use machinery in their own fields on an affordable fee-for-service basis offered by machinery owners. This approach reduces capital constraints for smallholder farmers while enabling entrepreneurs who can afford equipment to enter into business serving stallholder farmers as clients. This approach is now widely practiced in Bangladesh, where machinery entrepreneurs play a crucial role in providing access to productive technologies for smallholder farmers who could not otherwise afford direct purchase of labor- and cost-saving machinery. In order to maintain low machinery purchase costs for emerging yet capital constrained rural entrepreneurs, while also assuring high quality standards, cost-effective domestic production of agricultural machinery is increasingly championed as an important long-term national development objective. With no safety standards or guidelines for best production practices, the few manufacturing workshops that exist within Bangladesh operate inefficiently and without clear rationalization of manufacturing processes. Haphazard copying of prototypes or imported available machinery is common. This leads to inefficient production and poor product quality in an emerging but potentially highly beneficial industry. This paper addresses these problems and presents a case study to increase machinery manufacturers' capacity while improving manufacturing operations and workplace safety through equipment selection, workshop layout, and usability.Janata Engineering (JE) is a small-scale machinery manufacturing enterprise in Bangladesh, specializing in two-wheel tractor attachments such as bed planters, local derivations of power-tiller operated seeders, and other equipment for planting, irrigating, and processing crops. JE was expanding and setting up a second factory for which the authors provided assistance on its design. Our research question was whether participatory action research (PAR) supported by empirical data could provide improved factory design in terms of functionality, safety and human interactions, when compared with conventional approaches driven by technical efficiency concerns alone. Using PAR, we developed a number of alternative process and layout recommendations for JE to increase the efficiency of labor and machinery through improved workflow, throughput, and output. While immediately useful for JE, the process and protocols proposed in this paper are relevant for emerging agricultural machinery manufacturers in Bangladesh and more widely in South Asia.

Highlights

  • The implications of agricultural mechanization have been a subject of scholarly debate for several decades (Mellor, 1973; Agarwal, 1981; Sison et al, 1985; Biggs et al, 2011; Kienzle et al, 2013)

  • Contemporary development initiatives focusing on farm mechani­ zation increasingly point to the need for ‘scale-appropriate’ mechanization that makes use of affordable equipment custom-designed for the small fields and low-resource endowments of smallholder farming systems (Krupnik et al, 2013)

  • Action research results indicated that the man­ agers of the Janata Engineering (JE) workshop prioritize six primary functions: (1) parts fabrication with tools and raw materials, (2) assembly and testing, (3) inventory storage, (4) business operations and (5) space for taking breaks, and (6) personal storage

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The implications of agricultural mechanization have been a subject of scholarly debate for several decades (Mellor, 1973; Agarwal, 1981; Sison et al, 1985; Biggs et al, 2011; Kienzle et al, 2013). Concerns regarding rural labor displacement were widely voiced in the early literature (Mellor, 1973; Smith and Gascon, 1979; Agarwal, 1981; Sison et al, 1985), rural communities in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia are increasingly witnessing out-migration as farmers leave their homes in search of more remunerative employment (de Haan, 2002; Gartaula et al, 2012; Mendola, 2012; Zhang et al, 2014) This has created growing agricultural labor scarcity challenges and has refocused attention on agricultural mechanization in development research and policy (FAO, 2008; Collette et al, 2011; Mrema et al, 2014). Machinery ser­ vice provision can overcome some of the capital constraints to machinery purchase for smallholder farmers, while enabling entrepre­ neurs who can afford equipment earn extra income after tending to their own fields through business endeavors serving smallholder farmers clients (Keil et al, 2016)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call