Abstract

Cooperation in nature is usually between relatives, but unrelated individuals can also cooperate, requiring significant benefits to outweigh the costs of helping non-kin. Unrelated queens of the ant, Pogonomyrmex californicus, work together to found a new colony, a phenomenon known as pleometrosis. While previous studies have shown that pleometrosis improves queen survival and worker production, little is known of the behavioral interactions within nests that explain these advantages. We aimed to determine how the optimal group size for a small, simple social group is related to group productivity and the organization of work. Collecting queens from a known pleometrotic population, we established nests with either one, three, six, or nine foundresses and observed the resulting nascent colonies for 50 days. We found that queens in social founding groups survived longer and had higher productivity. While all social groups were equally successful in producing workers, intermediate-sized groups were most successful in terms of per capita production. Inactivity increased with group size. In addition, the proportion of essential colony growth tasks performed (such as foraging and brood care) was lowest in both solitary-founded groups and in groups of nine queens. As a result, intermediate sized groups outperformed both solitary queens and groups of nine in the efficiency with which they converted eggs into workers. These results emphasize the benefits of cooperation and the ways in which group size can influence fitness and the allocation of labor in social groups.

Highlights

  • A central question in social biology is that of why groups form

  • Mortality rates were similar across all social group sizes (Log Rank Mantel-Cox: χ2 = 4.3; df = 2; p = 0.117; Figure 1)

  • Our results show strong concordance with observed typical queen numbers in field populations for the polygynous population of Pogonomyrmex californicus

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A central question in social biology is that of why groups form. By contributing to the group, individual members may sacrifice some “market share” of direct fitness. In many contexts, these costs can be offset by indirect gains, in groups with significant. The question of group formation becomes interesting, when cooperators are not relatives (Dugatkin, 2002; Clutton-Brock, 2009; Taborsky et al, 2016). In such cases, indirect fitness moves toward zero, and direct fitness becomes the primary focus of selection

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call