Efficiency of some modified urea fertilisers for wetland rice grown on a permeable soil

Abstract

Split broadcast applications of prilled urea, deep point-placed urea supergranules (USG), and broadcast sulfur-coated urea (SCU) were compared as nitrogen sources for wetland rice (Oryza sativa L.) in two field experiments on a sandy soil (Typic Ustipsamment) with a high percolation rate (approx. 110 mm/day) in the Punjab, India. The USG was consistently less effective than the split urea and averaged 1 ton ha−1 less rice yield at the highest nitrogen rate (116 kg N ha−1). SCU produced the highest grain yields in both experiments; it averaged 1.7 ton ha−1 more than did the split urea at the highest N rate. The fertilisers were then compared in field microplots; percolation was permitted or prevented so that the cause of the poor performance of USG could be elucidated. USG gave higher grain yield and N uptake in microplots that were not leached than in those that were leached. In leached microplots, the grain yields were higher from prilled urea than from USG treatments provided the placement pattern of the USG matched that of the field plots. Yields were not higher from treatments in which the USG were more closely spaced. In microplots in which leaching was prevented, the broadcast prilled urea was less effective than the deep-placed USG, which gave yields approximately 60% greater than those from split urea and the same as those from SCU. Broadcast prilled urea in undrained microplots caused high levels of ammonium (40 ppm) to develop in the floodwater where high pH (8.9) and high alkalinity (4.9 meq l−1) may have led to extensive ammonia volatilisation. The use of USG and SCU in undrained microplots reduced floodwater ammonium levels to less than 3 ppm. Urea and ammonium leaching losses measured in fallow soil columns in the laboratory were much greater from USG than from prilled urea. Leaching losses from SCU were negligible. The data suggest that SCU is the preferred N source for rice soils having a high percolation rate and that USG is a poor alternative to split applications of prilled urea.