Abstract
Search theory deals with the efficiency of covering searchpatterns; a classical example is systematic row search with sweep spacing dependent upon window size. Human visual search is a function of contrast and size of the targets and of effective visual lobe size, this latter influenced by clutter and foveal load. Human searchpatterns often are optimal covers. Experimental results presented in this paper demonstrate that this is true for instrumental search with display windows controlled by human subjects and quantified with a formula for efficiency. Visual searchpatterns using free eye movements often develop complex irregular sequential searchpatterns.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
