Efficiency of interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization for BCR/ABL on peripheral blood smears for monitoring of CML patients: a comparison with bone marrow findings.

Abstract

Conventional cytogenetic analysis (CCA) is the standard method for monitoring of the Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Evaluation of breakpoint cluster region/abelson murine leukemia (BCR/ABL) fusion using interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization on peripheral blood smears (PB-FISH) might be another approach allowing more frequent and less invasive follow-up investigations. Herein, BCR/ABL fusion gene was assessed on 21 PB smears from 16 CML patients in chronic phase. Results of PB-FISH were compared with those of CCA and interphase FISH on bone marrow aspirates (BM-FISH). PB-FISH analysis was combined with CD3 immunophenotyping that allowed simultaneous investigation of the leukemic status of CD3(+) T lymphocytes and scoring CD3(-) cells for BCR/ABL fusion gene. Moreover, the frequency of BCR/ABL fusion in nonlymphoid PB cells was estimated according to the differential leukocyte counts. The incidence of BCR/ABL(+) fusion signals in CD3(+) T cells of CML patients was 5.3% (SD +/- 1.9) and did not exceed the normal cut-off value of 8%. A significant correlation (P < 0.001) was found between results of PB-FISH and methods of BM analysis (CCA or BM-FISH). Correction of PB-FISH results to include only nonlymphoid or CD3(-) cells reduced the mean of differences and improved agreement between PB-FISH and CCA or BM-FISH methods. The best agreement was noted between CCA and PB-FISH on nonlymphoid cells. On the other hand, results of BM-FISH agreed well with those of PB-FISH on CD3(-) cells. These findings imply that PB-FISH on nonlymphoid or CD3(-) cells is reliable and may replace BM analysis for monitoring of response to treatment in CML patients.