Abstract

Chemical‐looping combustion (CLC) is an innovative technology for power production with inherent carbon dioxide (CO2) capture. Even though CLC imposes no direct energy penalty for CO2 capture, previous works have shown significant energy penalties relative to natural gas (NG) combined cycle plants. This is due to the relatively low turbine inlet temperature (TIT), which is limited by the oxygen carrier used in the CLC process. Therefore, herein, an additional combustor (COMB) is included downstream of the CLC unit to raise the TIT (dependent on the CLC/COMB outlet temperature [COT] and the blade cooling). When NG is used in the additional COMB, the energy penalty is only 2.9% points with 72% CO2 capture. Achieving higher CO2 capture requires the use of H2 fuel in the COMB. The efficiency of the H2 production process plays an important role. For conventional H2 production with post‐combustion CO2 capture, the added COMB brings no improvement and the energy penalty is 8.8% points. For an advanced H2 production process (90% efficiency), the energy penalty reduces to 4.5% points with 100% CO2 capture. The results show the potential of CLC‐combined cycle power plants with an additional COMB to minimize the energy penalty of CO2 capture.

Highlights

  • Introduction the fuel and the oxidizerAn oxygen carrier (OC), which is generally a transition metal oxide,[7] is circulated between two interconnectedRising atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations are driv- reactors: a fuel reactor (FR), where the OC reduction by the fuel ing the scientific community to develop novel low-emission power takes place producing CO2 and steam (H2O), and an air reactor production technologies

  • A system-level model of a Chemical-looping combustion (CLC) combined cycle power plant incorporating an additional COMB after the CLC unit is developed

  • The reactor temperatures in CLC are limited by the OC material as well as the materials used in the construction of the reactor, the downstream cyclone, and the additional COMB

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations are driv- reactors: a fuel reactor (FR), where the OC reduction by the fuel ing the scientific community to develop novel low-emission power takes place producing CO2 and steam (H2O), and an air reactor production technologies. Stringent emission policies are being devised to mitigate CO2 emissions.[1] Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is one strategy toward low-emission power production. Even though these strategies provide significant carbon capture capability, they are associated with significant energy penalty. Recent studies indicate that the traditional CO2 capture (AR), where the OC is oxidized by the incoming air. Comprehensive details about the CLC process can be found in previous studies.[8,9] The generalized reactions in the two reactors are shown below

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call