Abstract
How should we make value judgments about wealth inequality? Harsanyi (1953) proposes that an individual evaluate wealth possibilities through expected utility under Rawl’s (1971) “veil of ignorance” assuming wealth levels are assigned uniformly. We propose an alternative notion of how wealth levels are assigned, based on a contest. Inequality can be captured through the equilibrium properties of such a game. We connect these inequality measures to existing measures, demonstrating the conditions under which they satisfy the received key axioms of inequality measures (anonymity, homogeneity and the Pigou–Dalton principle), and how they can evaluate a tradeoff between greater total wealth and greater inequality.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
