Efficacy study of platelet-rich plasma combined with core decompression and bone grafting in the treatment of early-stage avascular necrosis of the femoral head: a retrospective study

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of combined core decompression (CD), bone grafting (BG), and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in treating early-stage avascular necrosis of the femoral head (ANFH).MethodsA retrospective study was conducted on 74 patients (85 hips) with Ficat-Arlet stage I-II ANFH who were treated at our hospital between May 2015 and May 2018. The control group (20 patients, 22 hips) received symptomatic treatments, including weight-bearing reduction and oral analgesics. The CD + BG group (29 patients, 34 hips) underwent CD and β-tricalcium phosphate bone grafting. The PRP combination group (25 patients, 29 hips) received PRP injections in addition to CD and BG. Patients were followed up for five years to assess the necessity for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Data analysis was performed on those from the CD + BG and PRP groups who did not require THA. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Harris Hip Score (HHS), and the proportion of patients not accepting THA.ResultsAt the five-year follow-up, the rate of THA in the control group was 68.18% (15/22), while in the CD + BG group and the PRP combination group, the rates were 17.65% (6/34) and 10.34% (3/29), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the CD + BG group and the PRP combination group (P = 0.441), but both differed significantly from the control group (P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that over time, the proportion of patients in the PRP combination group who did not require THA was consistently higher than that in the CD + BG group. Among patients who did not undergo THA, the proportion of Ficat-Arlet stage I-II patients in the PRP combination group was 88.46% (23/26), which was higher than the 64.29% (18/28) in the CD + BG group, showing a significant difference (P = 0.038). VAS score and HHS were compared between the two groups at 6 months, 12 months, and the last follow-up point, with patients in the PRP combination group showing better scores than those in the CD + BG group (p < 0.05) in both metrics.ConclusionThe combination therapy of CD, BG, and PRP demonstrates significant advantages in improving symptoms and delaying disease progression in early-stage ANFH.