Efficacy, safety and tolerability of high caloric diet in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

BackgroundSeveral randomized clinical trials were done to determine whether supplementation with a high caloric diet, either through carbohydrate or lipid supplementation, is safe, tolerable and improves survival. However, most of these trials are small and the results are conflicting. MethodsRandomized prospective trials utilizing high caloric supplementation among patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) were searched using the terms [(“amyotrophic lateral sclerosis” or “motor neuron disease” or “ALS” or “MND”) and (“high calorie” or “high fat” or “high protein” or “high carbohydrate” or “supplementation”)] in Medline, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, Prospero and Herdin by two independent neurologists. Journal articles deemed relevant were assessed for eligibility. Main resultsThere were 57 articles obtained from databases, 49 of which were excluded. Four articles were further excluded since all of them had different interventions. Overall, there were 311 ALS patients included in the study, 176 of them were from the intervention group while 135 were used as controls. Overall, high caloric supplementation in ALS was deemed safe and tolerable, and also when adverse events, tolerability and mortality are combined using meta-analysis. Although in most publications the efficacy of giving high caloric supplementation has been generally beneficial, some of the outcome parameters are not statistically different from controls when studies are combined using meta-analysis. ConclusionsCurrent evidence suggests that high calorie supplementation is generally safe and tolerable for patients with ALS. However, it has not been shown to be efficacious in improving weight and functional disability.