Efficacy of Xianling Gubao capsule vs. its combination therapy in the treatment of primary osteoporosis: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the Xianling Gubao (XLGB) capsule alone and its combination therapy in primary osteoporosis (POP). MethodsDatabases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP, and SinoMed were searched from their inception to January 16, 2024, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the XLGB treatment for POP. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of multiple interventions in the treatment of POP. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to assess the quality of RCTs included in the meta-analysis. Software Stata (version 15.0) was used for statistical analysis. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) method was used to present the findings from this NMA numerically and graphically by ranking multiple interventions. ResultsA total of 107 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis, involving 10,032 participants and 21 interventions. Meta-analysis showed that XLGB + calcium (Ca) + calcitonin (99.9 %) was the most desirable treatment option for improving clinical efficacy. XLGB + Ca + bisphosphonate (BP) was most effective for improving bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, femoral neck BMD, and serum bone Gla protein (BGP). SUCRA values for improving these three outcome measures by XLGB + Ca + BP were 87.4 %, 77.2 %, and 84.3 %, respectively. XLGB + calcitonin was the optimal option in terms of safety evaluation and improving visual analogue scale (VAS), with the SUCRA values being 89.6 % and 94.9 %, respectively. ConclusionsThe XLGB combination therapy is a desirable option for treating POP as it can effectively improve the therapeutic effects, BMD, and serum BGP, as well as relieve pain in patients with POP.