Efficacy of Wound Coverage Techniques in Extremity Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections

Abstract

Little data exist about management of wounds created by debridement in necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs). Multiple wound coverage techniques exist, including complete primary wound closure, split-thickness skin grafting, secondary intention, and flap creation. We hypothesized that all wound coverage techniques would be associated with high rates of successful wound coverage and low crossover rates to other wound coverage techniques. NSTIs over a three-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Both the initial and secondary wound coverage techniques (if necessary) were recorded. The primary outcome was the ability to achieve complete wound coverage. Overall, 46 patients with NSTIs had long-term data available. Of the patients undergoing split-thickness skin grafting as the initial wound coverage technique, 8/8 (100%) achieved complete wound coverage; and of those undergoing flap creation, 1/1 (100%) achieved complete wound coverage; and of those undergoing complete primary wound closure, 4/4 (100%) achieved complete wound coverage. Of the patients undergoing secondary intention as the initial wound coverage technique, 5/33 (15.2%) achieved complete wound coverage and 28/33 (84.8%) required a secondary wound coverage technique with split-thickness skin grafting. All 46 patients achieved long-term successful wound coverage. Time to wound coverage did not vary with initial wound coverage technique (P = 0.44). Split-thickness skin grafting, flap creation, complete primary wound closure, and secondary intention are all reasonable choices for initial wound coverage for NSTIs. Although secondary intention had a low success rate as an initial wound coverage technique, all patients ultimately achieved complete wound coverage without a significant increase in time to coverage.