Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of ProTaper and K3 in the removal of gutta-percha during root canal retreatment in comparison with hand Hedstrom files. Time of gutta-percha removal and amount of apically extruded debris were also evaluated. Sixty extracted single-rooted anterior teeth and premolars were instrumented and obturated with laterally condensed gutta-percha technique. The teeth were cleared and randomly divided into three groups of 20 teeth each. The roots were split longitudinally, digital images were created using a scanner, and the areas of remaining filling material were traced using Ulead Photoimpact7 then calculated using SigmaScan software. The results indicated that the two rotary nickel-titanium instruments left significantly less remaining filling material than hand instruments (p < 0.001). The ProTaper and K3 required significantly less time for filling material removal than hand instruments (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference among the three techniques regarding the amount of apically extruded debris (p = 0.159). In conclusion, ProTaper and K3 were found to be effective and faster in removing gutta-percha.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
