Efficacy of the hypothermic compression bandage in the surgical wound of cardiac devices

Abstract

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction Pocket hematoma is one of the most frequent complications (10%) of the cardiac devices implant. To reduce the risk of bleeding, once the wound is sutured and isolated with a sterile dressing, the nurse performs a compression bandage over the area of the generator pocket. The choice of the type of bandage on the wound of the generator pocket is the responsibility of the nurse and there are several methods that vary according to the center. The vasocontrictive property of ice is known but its applicability is not demonstrated in these types of wounds. Objective Evaluate the efficacy of the hypothermic compression bandage versus conventional compression bandage, for the prevention of surgical wound post cardiac device implant hematoma in chronic oral anticoagulant and / or platelet antiaggregant treatment. Methodology This is a randomized prospective study. The protocol was accepted by ethical committee. The team of nurses from the arrhythmia laboratory recruited 310 patients (sample size with statistical calculation) who were going to undergo an implant or replacement of a pacemaker or internal defibrillator. Those patients who were under treatment with oral anticoagulant and/or platelet antiaggregants were selected. Through a list of random numbers two therapeutic branches were created: the intervention group was applied a compressive bandage with ice and the usual group lacked the conventional compressive bandage. Both bandages placed just at the end of wound closure and for 6 hours post-implant. Skin status was stratified between healthy, ecchymosis, mild hematoma and severe hematoma. The assessment of the state of the skin was performed by a blinded nurse, in the control of the wound at 7 days post intervention. The primary endpoint was the appearance of hematoma. The secundary endpoint was the appearance of severe hematoma, defined as bleeding with vital commitment that required drainage or rehospitalization. Results 310 patients participated in the study. 156 patients were randomized to the intervention group and 153 to usual care. The mean age of the sample was 73.77 ± 10.68 years and 74.8% were men. There were no significant differences between the intervention and usual care groups on any baseline demographic or clinical characteristics. A total of 13 patients presented hematoma and 36 patients presented ecchymosis. In the intervention group, 5.88% (n = 18) of ecchymosis and 1.3% (n = 4) of mild hematoma were observed. In the usual care group, 5.88% (n = 18) of ecchymosis and 2.9% (n = 9) of mild hematoma were observed. No patient in neither groups had severe hematoma. No significant differences were observed between the two types of bandage in any of the 3 levels of hematomas. There were also no significant differences between hematoma and the type of platelet antiaggregants or oral anticoagulant. Conclusion After this study it is observed that there is no difference between applying a compression bandage with or without cold.