Abstract

In the current diabetes era, severe calcified femoral bifurcation lesions extending to the external elastic lamina are sometimes experienced and are technically challenging during conventional endarterectomy. We previously reported an alternative method, a decalcification technique with a Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA), for calcified lesions. This study aimed to clarify the efficacy of CUSA decalcification technique. A total of 26 limbs treated with CUSA decalcification from 2014 to 2017 were enrolled and evaluated hemodynamically with ankle-brachial index (ABI) and morphologically with computed tomography angiography (CTA). ABI was measured every 6months, and CTA was performed early after surgery and then annually thereafter. Curved planar reformation images and cross-sectional multiplanar reconstruction images obtained by CTA were used to measure the cross-sectional area of the common femoral artery (CFA). Then, the time courses of the ABI and CFA areas were analyzed. The operative indication was claudication in 80.8%, rest pain in 7.7%, and tissue loss in 11.5% of the cases. A concomitant profundaplasty was performed in 34.6% of the cases. One case of an intraoperative arterial wall perforation was experienced as a procedure-related complication. Hemodynamic success rate was 96.2% (preoperative ABI: 0.37±0.28, postoperative ABI: 0.75±0.15, P<0.0001) and technical success rate was 100.0% (preoperative CFA area: 4.1±5.9mm2, postoperative CFA area: 46.1±17.0mm2, P<0.0001), with clinical improvement achieved in 95.8% of cases. Primary and secondary patency rates of the CFA were 100.0% at 2years postoperatively, and the reintervention-free rate for the ipsilateral limb was 88.5% at 2years postoperatively. Over a median follow-up period of 28.0 months (range, 12.3-67.0 months), the restenosis rate of CFA was 7.6%, when restenosis was defined as a >50% decrease in cross-sectional area. CUSA decalcification is a safe and effective alternative method to treat heavily calcified femoral lesions with a good patency rate and a low restenosis rate.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call