Abstract

Context: The possible pathophysiological mechanisms of no-reflow are ischemic injury, reperfusion injury, endothelial injury, distal thromboembolism, etc., Moreover, no-reflow can also remarkably increase the risks of acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, malignant arrhythmia, pericardial tamponade, and even death. Aims: The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of sodium nitroprusside combined with verapamil in the treatment of no-reflow. Settings and Design: From December 2016 to December 2017, 100 patients with no-reflow during coronary intervention in our hospital were selected and randomly divided into two groups: treatment group (50 cases) treated by sodium nitroprusside combined with verapamil and control group (50 cases) treated with sodium nitroprusside treatment alone. Subjects and Methods: The blood flow grading of the two groups according to a thrombolysis test in myocardial infarction (TIMI) was compared and analyzed, and the incidence of cardiovascular adverse events was compared in the 6-month period following the operation. Statistical Analysis Used: SPSS 17.0 (IBM, America) was employed in all calculations. Quantitative data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation, and intergroup comparison was calculated using a two-tailed t-test. Qualitative data were presented in percentages, and intergroup comparison was performed with Chi-square test.P

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call