Abstract

BackgroundDepression is a chronic illness that generally requires lifelong therapy. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive technique with few side effects that has been reported to be useful in the treatment of depression. However, no studies to date have evaluated in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) the efficacy of rTMS for maintenance treatment of depression.Methods/designIn this article, we report the design and protocol of a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study in China to evaluate the efficacy of rTMS in the prevention of relapse of depressive symptoms. In total, 540 patients, aged 18 to 60 years, diagnosed with depression and experiencing an acute exacerbation of depressive symptoms, will be enrolled. The study will consist of four phases: a screening/tolerability phase of up to 7 days; an open-label, flexible-dose lead-in phase of 8 weeks; an open-label, fixed-dose stabilization phase of 6 weeks; and a single-blind relapse prevention phase of 12 months. During the open-label phase, all patients will be treated with venlafaxine. Remitters with Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D17) score ≤7 will be eligible to enter the single-blind phase and will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: group 1 on active rTMS and venlafaxine; group 2 on sham rTMS and venlafaxine; and group 3 on venlafaxine alone. Efficacy will be evaluated during the study using relapse assessment (time between subject randomization to treatment and the first occurrence of relapse). Secondary outcome measures will include: symptom changes, measured by the HAM-D17; illness severity changes, measured by the Clinical Global Impression of Severity for Depression (CGI-S-DEP); and changes in subject functioning, assessed with the Personal and Social Performance (PSP)scale. Safety will be assessed throughout the study by monitoring of adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, electrocardiography (ECG), and measurements of vital signs (temperature, pulse, and blood pressure) and weight. Suicidality will be assessed by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS).DiscussionThe result of this trial will assess the efficacy of rTMS in the prevention of relapse of symptoms of depression by determining whether rTMS in combination with an antidepressant is more efficacious than the antidepressant alone for maintenance of the clinical response.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01516931

Highlights

  • Depression is a chronic illness that generally requires lifelong therapy

  • Li et al have described seven adults with bipolar depression who responded acutely to Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), and were treated weekly with rTMS for up to 1 year; the results suggested that rTMS could potentially be used as an adjunctive maintenance treatment for at least some patients with bipolar depression [8]

  • Patients and enrolment Inclusion criteria In total, 540 subjects aged 18 to 60 years, meeting the criteria for depression defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV), and experiencing an acute exacerbation of depression symptoms, having a baseline score of at least 14 points on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D17) will be enrolled

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive technique with few side effects that has been reported to be useful in the treatment of depression. No studies to date have evaluated in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) the efficacy of rTMS for maintenance treatment of depression. Biological treatments, including repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), are considered additional options for the management of MDD. According to most clinical studies and meta-analyses, highfrequency rTMS is more effective than a sham control in the treatment of MDD in the acute stage and during partial remission [3,4]. Some studies have even reported that the efficacy of rTMS and the longitudinal outcomes of rTMS-treated patients are at least as good as those obtained with ECT [5,6,7]

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call