Abstract
BackgroundThe incidence of vulvovaginal candidiasis, a common infection among healthy women primarily caused by the yeast Candida albicans, has increased significantly in recent years. AimsThe purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of ravuconazole (RVC) and fluconazole (FLC) in the treatment of experimental C. albicans vaginitis. MethodsForty isolates of C. albicans were screened for their in vitro susceptibility to RVC and FLC. A strain of C. albicans that was resistant to FLC (minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] of >64μg/ml) was selected for the in vivo study. Treatment regimens for the murine vaginal infection model were (1) 1, 5, 10, and 20mg/kg RVC once daily, (2) 20mg/kg RVC twice daily, (3) 20mg/kg FLC once daily, and (4) 20mg/kg FLC twice daily. ResultsThe geometric means of the MIC values at 48h for all isolates tested were 0.05 and 0.5μg/ml for RVC and FLC, respectively. Regimens of either RVC or FLC at 20mg/kg twice daily were more effective to reduce the load of FLC-resistant C. albicans than single dose administration. ConclusionsComplete eradication of C. albicans from the vagina was not observed with RVC or FLC treatment in the animal model, although RVC treatment showed a lower fungal concentration 14 days after drug administration.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.