Abstract

Introduction and objectives. The combination of radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors has demonstrated antitumor activity in numerous preclinical studies and is currently being investigated in the clinical setting. This study aims to compare the efficacy of radiotherapy alone (RT) vs. the combination of radio- and immunotherapy (IT-RT) and identify the treatment regimen associated with maximal efficacy by using a meta-analysis.
 Materials and methods. A systematic literature search was performed using the PubMed database and materials of the key oncology congresses. Studies reporting 1-year overall survival (OS) of patients with brain metastases undergoing IT-RT treatment were included in the analysis. Information about 1-year OS, individual patients characteristics, and treatment regimens for both IT-RT and control RT arms was extracted. Identification of the optimal treatment regimen was performed using a mixed meta-regression modeling approach. Analysis was performed using the R statistical environment (metafoR package).
 Results. In total, 30 studies were identified, of which 13 reported outcomes for the control RT groups. The analysis revealed that IT inclusion into RT is associated with a significant increase in 1-year OS; given simultaneously, IT and RT demonstrated the highest efficacy with a 1-year OS of 68% (95% confidence interval (CI): 60%75%), followed by a sequential regimen: 1-year OS = 54% (95% CI: 47%61%) and RT alone: 1-year OS = 32% (95% CI: 2539%).
 Conclusion. The current study demonstrates the superiority of combined IT-RT over RT alone; simultaneous IT and RT treatment is associated with the highest efficacy.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.