Efficacy of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation versus Antiarrhythmic Drugs in Treating High Burden Premature Ventricular Contractions in Children with Structurally Normal Heart

Abstract

Abstract Background Scarce literature on whether antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) or radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) is more efficacious when treating idiopathic high burden premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) in children with many questions remain unanswered in this age group. Objectives To compare the efficacy of RFCA versus AADs on high burden idiopathic PVCs in children. Methods A total of 60 eligible child ≤18 years with High burden PVCs (≥10% of total beats per day) that were treated by either AADs (group A) or RFCA (group B). Both Baseline and followup clinical symptoms were collected, Physical examination, repeat standard ECG, standard or 12-lead Holter recording, and echocardiography were performed. Results Among RFCA (n = 30) and AADs (n = 30) groups, treatment success was 80.0% and 20.0% respectively, while AADs medications cessation was 73.3% and 26.7% respectively, the differences were statistically significant. Conclusion RFCA appears to be more efficacious than AADs in PVC reduction and consequently AADs medications cessation postablation. Performing RFCA in children with classical mapping and navigation was a safe and highly effective therapeutic option. Abbreviations AADs: antiarrhythmic drugs; BBB: bundle branch block; CCB: calcium channel blocker; ECG: electrocardiogram; LVEDD: left ventricular end-diastolic dimension; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; LVESD: left ventricular end-systolic dimension; LVOT: left ventricular outflow tract; NSVT: non sustained ventricular tachycardia; PVC: premature ventricular contraction; RFCA: radiofrequency catheter ablation; RV: right ventricular/ventricle; RVOT: right ventricular outflow tract